Skip to main content

The Power of Corporations




 157 of the top 200 economic entities are corporations   —   Global Justice Now

Four global corporations — Chevron, Exxon, BP, and Shell are responsible for more than 10% of the world’s carbon emissions                           —   The Guardian in 2019

Adidas supplier factories still had “excessive working hours and extremely low wages” in 2010                                                                              —   China Labour Watch

Around two-thirds agree that the government had benefited large banks, financial institutions, large corporations, and wealthy people, and the rest of the population had benefited “not too much or not at all.”                          —   Pew Research Centre


                                       --------------------------------------------------


The revenues of the world’s 200 largest corporations were equivalent to 47.5% of world gross domestic product (GDP) in 2016.

General Motors is now bigger than Denmark.

Walmart exceeds Spain and Australia.

Daimler Chrysler is bigger than Poland.

Royal Dutch/Shell is bigger than Venezuela.

IBM is bigger than Singapore; and

Sony is bigger than Pakistan. 
 
 Apple has greater revenues than Belgium, Mexico and Switzerland.

Finland’s budget was about 40 billion euros, 20% less than Nokia’s annual sales.

                                  ------------------------------------------------------


A corporate entity is a legal fiction with neither morals nor soul.

The economic power in the hands of the few persons who control a giant corporation is a tremendous force that can harm or benefit a multitude of individuals, affect whole districts, shift the currents of trade, bring ruin to one community and prosperity to another.

The rise of the modern corporation has brought a concentration of economic power that can compete on equal terms with the modern state. Big tech companies — Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft — present novel threats that exacerbate the crisis of corporate concentration and economic inequality.

Many of these companies have a track record of wielding their newfound power in deeply dangerous ways, including harvesting our data, engaging in surveillance and algorithmic bias, and adopting fiercely anti-competitive practices.

The largest and wealthiest corporations have gained unprecedented power and influence in contemporary life. The decisions made by them have an enormous impact on how we live and work, what we eat, our physical and psychological health, what we know or believe, whom we elect, and how we deal with one another and with the natural world around us.

The government seems ever more subservient to the power of these oligopolies, providing numerous forms of corporate welfare — tax breaks, subsidies, guarantees, and bailouts — while neglecting the most basic needs of the population.

Markets are inherently political, partially due to their “ties to the regulatory functions of the state”. Markets can no longer be regarded as entirely separate entities from the state. Therefore, the issue of corporate social responsibility is political and should be treated as such.

 

The Rise of Corporate Power

Corporations have proven themselves to be faithless stewards of political power. Greed trumps principle. Corporate power today is a weed that has grown out of control, choking off everything else and ruining the garden.

The corporate end-goal of maximizing profit is destroying our environment and ruining livelihoods in developing nations. Even with loose codes of conduct and labour laws in place, multinationals are still able to exploit workers and significantly contribute to climate change.

Over the last few decades, corporations have lobbied to weaken laws and policies governing antitrust, environmental protections, worker rights and protections, and more — all to further consolidate their own power.

Corporate concentration only helps consolidate power among a wealthy few, which in turn worsens economic inequality, destabilises our communities and democracy, and slows overall economic growth. It exacerbates racial inequities and entrenches economic and social disparities between people.

As has been made abundantly clear throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, corporate concentration also contributes to price hikes and puts negative pressure on wages.

Corporate monopolies harm consumers and small businesses by curbing competition through practices such as self-preferencing and predatory pricing. They unionize and undermine working people’s power. They lobby lawmakers to embed racist and extractive policies into our economic and political systems, all to further consolidate their own power and wealth.

 

Corporate power is the result of the merger of the corporation and the state.

Corporations amassed an ever-expanding set of rights through the courts, going much beyond property rights that are essential for corporations to serve society and eventually including liberty rights initially created for human citizens.

Society is ruled and dominated by a small minority of the wealthiest. The rich have always been powerful; they have been present in all societies. But the degree of control being exercised now is too high. The number of ultra-rich people essentially buying political power is high.

The public relations and technical resources controlled by corporations and the richest individuals are high. The much denser concentration of wealth in even the largest countries is high, and the global nature of the resources, power, and connections being accumulated have combined to foreclose meaningful democratic options and space for a life independent of the materialistic values of the plutocracy.


The economy no longer facilitates human society; humans live to serve the economy. The logic that undergirds all of this — the greed for money, power, and control — is antithetical to preserving an environment in which living things can thrive.

 

Corporate power is protected, but the people’s rights are stripped and rejected.

Through most of human history, we have endured various unbalanced political and social systems. Today’s market economy has roots going back centuries, but only in this one has it become so monolithic, with virtually the entire world under its spell.

We are living in an age of hyper-capitalism; we have gone beyond industrialization and value addition to a point where the rules are written by the financiers, and the finance industry, rather than a sector that actually makes something, has become arguably the most politically powerful industry in history.


A brief period of relative equality in the richer countries after World War II gave way in the late 1970s to a powerful ideology of competition, unending growth, and unhindered profit. This ideology was charted deliberately by institutes lavishly funded by aspiring plutocrats.

The denial of limits, the privilege of competition and profit over cooperation and public goods, and the capitulation of governments to the power of money have made modern plutocracy a dominant reality and one that must be reversed. “Freedom” has been reconfigured to refer to consumer choice rather than the ability to determine how to order one’s life.

A few years ago, there was considerable debate about the concept of “peak oil — the possibility we were reaching the beginning of the end of usable petroleum supplies. We may be reaching a more dangerous point — peak plutocracy — where society and the environment can sustain no more concentration of power and resources.

The now predominant and powerful ideology of competition, unending growth, and unhindered profit was charted deliberately by institutes lavishly funded by aspiring plutocrats. So, it is worrying to hear so consistently from colleagues around the world about the extent to which the power of people is being curtailed by the people with power.

We see evidence of peak corporatocracy in:

- the so far largely successful efforts of business interests to prevent meaningful action on climate change.

- the push for high-input, high-tech, restricted-ownership agriculture that excludes smallholder farmers — a great portion of them women — who feed most of the world’s people.

-the collusion of governments and companies in taking control of land and natural resources from communities in order to generate profits for privileged outsiders.

-the “race to the bottom” among governments to sacrifice revenues through blanket “tax holidays” in order to lure foreign investment, even when the benefits are unclear or negligible.

 

Corporate Power must be confronted.

Addressing this imbalance requires more than policy changes. Power must shift away from corporations and back to the people. We may, as individuals lack the power to entirely change the course of climate change or stop ongoing corporate exploitation, but we can still hold these corporations accountable.

Boycotting companies and pressuring governments to place heavier regulations on corporate entities can change the outcome of detrimental corporate plans. We must continue to hold corporations responsible for their detrimental impacts on humanity and our planet.

We can boycott companies; we can educate ourselves on ethical consumerism. We are not socially responsible for the way in which our capitalist society is formed, but in some ways, as consumers, we hold the most power.

One example of successful boycotting was when Greenpeace organised a media campaign to stop the leading oil company Shell from sinking the Brent Spar oil platform in the North Sea. Consumer boycotts of Shell gasoline led to a substantial fall in sales, and as a result, Shell made a drastic U-turn and did not sink the platform.

Organisations such as the Asia Floor Wage Alliance have placed pressure on global corporations to increase living wages for employees in developing nations — another example of successful corporate pressure to instigate change.


“This is a global political issue we should all be paying attention to. We must get out the pruning shears and the weed-whacker quickly and cut back on the dangerous levels of corporate influence.”


 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 

Thanks a million for reading.

Would you be willing to follow me? Head on over to Medium link.                                                                          

Did you like this article? If yes, please subscribe. Share this post with your network or a friend.


Links to My Profile -

Medium —  https://www.medium.com/@jdhopte

LinkedIn — linkedin.com/in/jitendra-dhopte-b891609a

Amazon —  https://www.amazon.com/stores/author/B0BTTFTRT8/about

Goodreads —  https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/28190544J_Dhopte

 

https://www.amazon.com/Erosion-Democracy-J-Dhopte/dp/B0BX1QZY6X/



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Waves of Democracy

Source - NewsClick   1920 - After First World War, the number of democracies in the world had doubled. 1942 - The number of democracies had reduced to 12.  1962 - The number of democracies had grown to 36. 1975 - More than 30 governments had been installed by military coups.   Early 1980s - The number of democracies rose to an astonishing 120.   In political science,  the wave of democracy means the major surge of democracy which have occurred in history.  Till now, three waves of democracy have occurred in history of the world. Put simply, ‘a wave of democracy is a group of transitions from non-democratic regimes to democratic regimes that occur within a specified period of time and that significantly outnumber transitions in the opposite direction’. Democratization often advances in clusters or waves. The wave of democracy has been linked to sudden shifts in the distribution of power among the great powers, which creates openings and incentives to introduce sweeping

Is Democracy Fading Away?

  Only 9% of the world's population lives in   high-performing democracies. More than a quarter of the world's population   now lives in democracies which are eroding. 70% of the world's population now lives in   either outright non-democratic or democratically backsliding countries.   The absolute number of democracies has been decreasing since 2006. More democracies than ever before are experiencing democratic erosion. The number of democratically regressive countries has never been greater than in the last decade. Democratic erosion is a decline in democratic quality manifested by a statistically significant decline in at least one aspect of democracy. It is the sustained and deliberate subversion of basic democratic tenets by political actors and governments. Democratic erosion  is on the verge of becoming a new type of pandemic. According to various measures of good governance and rule of law, there is an increasing incidence of democratic breakdowns, democr